the munster say something
about the alleged bite
of $15,000
K
the manager
frand of the form Rm 15/5.
former.
arnice
Mr Meade
The Attorney General's report has now
come & is annexed;
385
Litigation;
we have received here
affic Papers.
4
for notice the matter in the London'd
4
China Telegraph of d 8
January Cost (herewith)) I then was watching papers for
"
fuller reports
on t
Asuvation.
only deals with
the "special jury" charge in par. 6 Mr Nelson's letter.
Therewith
The suit of Pilman v. Houshing Club (par. 13 of Mr Nelson's letter) is now concluded; see China Telegraph (h) of May 16. p.405; the Plaintiff losing, but each side
The "Opium " seems not to be paying costs.
204 Ended.
? Reply that Lord Kimberley sees no sufficient reason to institute Inquiry into the administration of justice in this case; and then refer to par. 2 of the despatch
For Treads
& Jaucerd.
ar
above.
G.W. I.
24 May
with regard to your question what the
outting has fallen
Mt Meade
lan oles
48 May 26.
The Attorney General
has satisfactorily explained his
refusal to take
Summoning
AC
any
steps for
special during
upon Mt Nelson's applications.
Nevertheless the thing
Justice summed up for the conviction of der Pitman who was convicted by
by the Jury
accordingly. So far Mer helson has
Farm
no ground of complaint
Bond although
the munter say something
about the alleged bite
of $15,000
K
the muigver
frand of the form Rm 15/5.
former.
arnice
Mr Meade
The Attorney feel's report has now
come &is annexed;
Α
385
Litigatione ;
we have received her
في
affic Papas.
4
for notice the matter in the Lordon'd
4
China Telepopl" of d 8
Jamnay Cost (herewith)) I then bus watching mice for
"
fuller reports
on t
ཧཱུྃ
as fat
раз
Asuvation.
only deals with
вор
the "special jury" charge in par. 6 Mr Nelson's letter.
Therewith
The suit of Pilman v. Houshing Clut (par. 13 of Mr Nelson's letter) is now concluded; see China Telegraph (h) of May 16. .p.405; the Plaintiff losing, but each lide
The "Opium "seems not to be paying costs.
204 Ended.
? Reply that Lord Kimberley sees no sufficient reason to institute Inquiry into the administration of justice in this case; and then refer to par. 2 of the desp
For Treads
& Jaucerd.
ar
above.
G.W. I.
24 May
brith regard to your question what the
outhing has fallen
Mt Meade
lan oles
48 mg 26.
The Attorney General
has satisfactorily & planned his
refusal to take.
Summoning
AC
any
steps for
special during
apon Mt Nelson's applications.
Nevertheless the thing
Justice summed up for the conviction of der Pitman who was convicted by
by the accordingly. So far Mer helson has
Jury
Farm
no ground of complaint
Bond although
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.